Roshni Dasgupta · Optimization of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment of neuroblastoma
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Feb 2020Older

Optimization of percutaneous biopsy for diagnosis and pretreatment risk assessment of neuroblastoma

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Feb 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Multi-institutional study of 243 children demonstrates that percutaneous core needle biopsy achieves comparable diagnostic accuracy to open biopsy for neuroblastoma (95.7% vs 98.9%) and MYCN determination, with fewer transfusions and lower opioid use. Fresh specimen evaluation by pediatric pathologists improves yield for molecular markers critical to risk stratification.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Roshni Dasgupta

Background: Image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (PCNB) is increasingly utilized to diagnose solid tumors. The objective of this study is to determine whether PCNB is adequate for modern biologic characterization of neuroblastoma. Procedure: A multi-institutional retrospective study was performed by the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative on children with neuroblastoma at 12 institutions over a 3-year period. Data collected included demographics, clinical details, biopsy technique, complications, and adequacy of biopsies for cytogenetic markers utilized by the Children's Oncology Group for risk stratification. Results: A total of 243 children were identified with a diagnosis of neuroblastoma: 79 (32.5%) tumor excision at diagnosis, 94 (38.7%) open incisional biopsy (IB), and 70 (28.8%) PCNB. Compared to IB, there was no significant difference in ability to accurately obtain a primary diagnosis by PCNB (95.7% vs 98.9%, P = .314) or determine MYCN copy number (92.4% vs 97.8%, P = .111). The yield for loss of heterozygosity and tumor ploidy was lower with PCNB versus IB (56.1% vs 90.9%, P < .05; and 58.0% vs. 88.5%, P < .05). Complications did not differ between groups (2.9 % vs 3.3%, P = 1.000), though the PCNB group had fewer blood transfusions and lower opioid usage. Efficacy of PCNB was improved for loss of heterozygosity when a pediatric pathologist evaluated the fresh specimen for adequacy. Conclusions: PCNB is a less invasive alternative to open bio

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →