Francesco T. Mangano · Management of vagal nerve stimulator infections: do they need to be removed?
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2009Older

Management of vagal nerve stimulator infections: do they need to be removed?

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Jan 2009 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective study of 191 VNS implantations found a 5.2% infection rate, predominantly S. aureus. Conservative antibiotic management successfully salvaged 2 of 7 devices without removal, though oral cephalexin proved inadequate as first-line therapy. All patients recovered regardless of approach.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Francesco T. Mangano

Object: Vagal nerve stimulators (VNSs) have been used successfully to treat medically refractory epilepsy. Although their efficacy is well established, appropriate management of infections is less clearly defined. In the authors' experience, patients who have gained a benefit from VNS implantation have been reluctant to have the device removed. The authors therefore sought conservative management options to salvage infected VNS systems. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of 191 (93 female and 98 male) consecutive patients in whom VNS systems were placed between 2000 and 2007. Results: They identified 10 infections (5.2%). In 9 of 10 patients the cultured organism was Staphylococcus aureus. Three (30%) of 10 patients underwent early removal (within 1 month) of the VNS as the initial treatment. The remaining 7 patients were initially treated with antibiotics. Two (28.6%) of these patients were successfully treated using antibiotics without VNS removal. Patients in whom conservative treatment failed were given cephalexin as first-line antibiotic treatment. All patients recovered completely regardless of treatment regimen. Conclusions: This study confirms the low rate of infection associated with VNS placement and suggests that, in the case of infection, treatment without removal is a viable option. However, the authors' data suggest that oral antibiotics are not the best first-line therapy.

Statements in this article

  1. Vagal nerve stimulators have been used successfully to treat medically refractory epilepsy.

    Established
  2. The infection rate associated with VNS placement was 5.2% (10 of 191 patients).

    ResearchResults
  3. In 9 of 10 infected cases, the cultured organism was Staphylococcus aureus.

    ResearchResults
  4. Three (30%) of 10 patients underwent early removal (within 1 month) of the VNS as the initial treatment.

    ResearchResults
  5. Seven patients were initially treated with antibiotics without device removal.

    ResearchResults
  6. Two (28.6%) of 7 patients were successfully treated using antibiotics without VNS removal.

    ResearchResults
  7. Patients in whom conservative treatment failed were given cephalexin as first-line antibiotic treatment.

    ResearchResults
  8. All patients recovered completely regardless of treatment regimen.

    ResearchResults
  9. Treatment without removal is a viable option in the case of VNS infection.

    RecommendationConclusions
  10. Oral antibiotics are not the best first-line therapy for VNS infections.

    RecommendationConclusions

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →