StayCurrentMD · Implementation and acceptance rates of a specially designed vacuometer for the vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum.
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2021Older

Implementation and acceptance rates of a specially designed vacuometer for the vacuum bell treatment of pectus excavatum.

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Mar 2021 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This prospective study evaluated a custom vacuometer device that allows patients to monitor negative pressure during vacuum bell therapy for pectus excavatum. Among 54 pediatric patients (mean age 12.6 years), the device achieved 83.3% satisfaction with no skin complications, suggesting it may improve treatment adherence and safety.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background / Purpose

To report the implementation of a specially designed vacuometer for the ambulatory measurement of the exact negative pressure self-applied by the patient when using the vacuum bell for the treatment of pectus excavatum and to analyze patient satisfaction with the device, by conducting a survey.

Methods

Between October 2018 and June 2020, all patients with pectus excavatum who received a vacuum bell at our Pectus Clinic were provided with a specially designed pectus vacuometer for their personal use. We described the vacuometer, the fundamentals of its development, and the utilization protocol. A survey was conducted evaluating comfort, clarity of instructions, usefulness, simplicity of connection, and likeability. The level of satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (very negative experience) to 5 (very positive experience). The occurrence of skin lesions provoked by the application of the vacuum bell was registered.

Results

From 72 submitted surveys, 54 patients answered. Patient demographics comprised 44 (81.5%) males and a mean age of 12.6 ± 6.0 years. The mean initial external pectus depth was 2.0 ± 0.7 cm and the mean duration of treatment was 13.2 ± 8.6 months. No skin lesions were detected while using the vacuum bell and the vacuometer. The mean general satisfaction score was 4.4 ± 0.7 and 83.3% of the respondents did not have any inconvenience with the vacuometer. A patient who considered himself cured was the only dropout during the study.

Conclusions

In this study, we described the feasibility and fundamentals of the application of a specifically designed vacuometer for ambulatory use as an adjunct to the treatment of pectus excavatum with a vacuum bell, and demonstrated a high satisfaction level with the device. In addition, the vacuometer might help avoid skin lesions secondary to the vacuum bell and foster adhesion to treatment.

Type of study

Treatment study.

Level of evidence

IV

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →