Functional MRI and electrical stimulation mapping for language localization: A comparative meta-analysis

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic validity of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) compared to electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) for pre-surgical language mapping. Methods: A structured literature search was performed and studies with electrode-level data comparing fMRI and ESM for language localization were analyzed. Outcome measures included pooled estimates of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity. Sources of heterogeneity were explored with a meta-regression framework. Results: Nine studies were included in the analysis having 5-40 patients with mean age 11.3-43.4 years. Verb generation and picture naming were the most common fMRI tasks, while picture naming was the most common ESM task. Sensitivity (0.37-0.95), specificity (0.36-0.97), and DOR (1.9-44.6) for fMRI compared to ESM varied widely across studies with statistically significant heterogeneities. Pooled estimates were: sensitivity 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.54, 0.83), specificity 0.74 (0.58, 0.85), and DOR 7.0 (3.5, 13.8), from a valid meta-analysis (area under the summary receiver-operating-curve 0.78). fMRI was noted to have higher sensitivity in studies using higher maximal ESM currents. fMRI variables could not be included in the meta-regression because of substantial methodological differences among studies. Conclusions: fMRI is moderately sensitive and moderately specific for language localization compared to ESM in well-designed