Examining audiology students’ clinical reasoning skills with virtual audiology cases aided with no collaboration, live collaboration, and virtual collaboration
medrxiv.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on medrxiv.org ↗Article · Jul 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This quasi-experimental study compared audiology students' clinical reasoning across three learning conditions: independent work, face-to-face collaboration, and virtual collaboration using simulation software. Results showed significant differences between groups, with both collaborative approaches enhancing clinical reasoning skills compared to working alone.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Statements in this article
A quasi-experimental design was conducted at two U.S. universities to examine clinical reasoning skills using IUP Audiosim software with three collaboration conditions: no collaboration, virtual collaboration, and live collaboration.
There was a significant difference in clinical reasoning skills between the three treatment groups (no collaboration, virtual collaboration, and live collaboration).