Francesco T. Mangano · Early Identification of Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: A Multicenter, Machine Learning, Prospective Validation Study
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Feb 2024Older

Early Identification of Candidates for Epilepsy Surgery: A Multicenter, Machine Learning, Prospective Validation Study

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Feb 2024 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This multicenter prospective study validates machine learning models that identify epilepsy surgery candidates earlier in their disease course using clinical data from EHRs. The models were tested across pediatric and adult epilepsy centers to reduce treatment delays and improve surgical referral timing.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Francesco T. Mangano

Background And Objectives: Epilepsy surgery is often delayed. We previously developed machine learning (ML) models to identify candidates for resective epilepsy surgery earlier in the disease course. In this study, we report the prospective validation. Methods: In this multicenter, prospective, longitudinal cohort study, random forest models were validated at a pediatric epilepsy center consisting of 2 hospitals and 14 outpatient neurology clinic sites and an adult epilepsy center with 2 hospitals and 27 outpatient neurology clinic sites. The models used neurology visit notes, EEG and MRI reports, visit patterns, hospitalizations, and medication, laboratory, and procedure orders to identify candidates for surgery. The models were trained on historical data up to May 10, 2019. Patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis of epilepsy who visited from May 11, 2019, to May 10, 2020, were screened by the algorithm and assigned surgical candidacy scores. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC), which was calculated by comparing scores from patients who underwent epilepsy surgery before November 10, 2020, against scores from nonsurgical patients. Nonsurgical patients' charts were reviewed to determine whether patients with high scores were more likely to be missed surgical candidates. Delay to surgery was defined as the time between the first visit that a surgical candidate was identified by the algorithm and the date of the surgery. Results: A total of 5,285 pediatric and 5,782 adu

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →