Development of a 3D-printed neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia model and standardisation of intra-operative measurement
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Dec 2023 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Researchers developed 3D-printed simulation models for neonatal CDH repair using fetal MRI data, enabling standardized training for both open and thoracoscopic approaches. Testing with 52 surgeons showed reliable measurement of diaphragmatic defects regardless of experience level or surgical approach, with mean errors of 3-4mm.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Introduction
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is frequently used for surgical simulation and training, however, no widely available model exists for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). The aim of this study was to develop a 3D-printed model of CDH and test interobserver variability in the simulated model for obtaining measurements of the diaphragmatic defect and ipsilateral diaphragm.
Methods
A term fetal MRI (3.5 kg) of thorax, diaphragm and defect (15 mm × 5 mm) were delineated and segmented after parental consent to produce 3D-printed models. Consultant and trainee paediatric surgeons were invited to measure the posterior-lateral diaphragmatic defect and ipsilateral diaphragm. Mean measurement error was calculated (millimetres). Data are presented as median (range) and number/total (%).
Results
An abdominal and thoracoscopic model were produced and tested by 52 participants (20 consultants and 32 trainees). Diaphragmatic defect via laparotomy measured 15 (10–20) mm (AP) × 16 (10–25) mm (ML) and thoracoscopically 14 (11–19) mm (AP) × 15 (11–22) mm (ML). Mean error per measurement was 4 (1–17) mm via laparotomy vs. 3 (0.5–9.5) mm thoracoscopically. Mean error was similar between consultants and trainees via laparotomy (4.3 vs. 3.9 mm, p = 0.70) and thoracoscopically (3 vs. 3 mm, p = 0.79). Error did not correlate with experience as operating surgeon via laparotomy (β = 13.0 [95% CI − 55.9 to 82.0], p = 0.71) or thoracoscopically (β = 1.4[95% CI − 6.4 to 9.2], p = 0.73.
Conclusions
We have designed and built simulation models for CDH repair via laparotomy and thoracoscopically. Operators can reliably measure the diaphragmatic defect and ipsilateral diaphragm, regardless of surgical experience and operative approach.