StayCurrentMD · Utility of ureteral diameter ratio for clinical decision-making in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a systematic review and meta analysis
Article1 min read·Published Nov 2024

Utility of ureteral diameter ratio for clinical decision-making in children with vesicoureteral reflux: a systematic review and meta analysis

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Nov 2024 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates ureteral diameter ratio (UDR) as a prognostic tool in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux management. Analysis of 13 retrospective studies shows UDR significantly predicts spontaneous resolution, breakthrough UTI risk, need for surgical intervention, and endoscopic treatment outcomes, though optimal cut-off values require further investigation.

  • Lower ureteral diameter ratio (UDR) predicts spontaneous resolution of VUR, helping identify children who may avoid surgical intervention.
  • Higher UDR correlates with breakthrough UTIs, need for operative intervention, and persistence after endoscopic treatment.
  • UDR shows promise as a prognostic tool but lacks validated cut-off values; further research needed to standardize clinical thresholds.
  • All included studies were retrospective with good methodological quality, limiting strength of recommendations for routine clinical use.
  • UDR measurement may guide shared decision-making between observation and intervention in pediatric VUR management.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of ureteral diameter ratio (UDR) as a tool to prognosticate and manage vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Four scientific databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus) were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were all studies in which UDR was used in prognostication and/or management of VUR. An independent assessment of the methodological quality was performed by two authors using the Newcastle Ottawa Quality scale. The statistical analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Thirteen studies (all retrospective) were included in this review. Pooling the data demonstrated a significantly lower UDR in the spontaneous resolution vs. persistence of VUR group (p = 0.001). Also, the pooled data showed significantly higher values of UDR in the breakthrough UTI group (p < 0.00001), those requiring operative intervention (p = 0.03), and those with persistence of VUR after endoscopic treatment (p < 0.0001). The estimated heterogeneity for two outcomes, i.e., spontaneous resolution and requirement of operative intervention in VUR were substantial and statistically significant. All except one of the included studies were of good methodological quality. However, further studies are required to identify the cut-off values for these respective outcomes.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →