Alberto Tozzi · Can Digital Tools Be Used for Improving Immunization Programs?
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2016Older

Can Digital Tools Be Used for Improving Immunization Programs?

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Mar 2016 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This review examines how digital tools can address barriers in immunization programs to improve vaccine coverage. The authors analyze applications across immunization registries, disease surveillance, adverse event monitoring, vaccine confidence tracking, and public information delivery, while discussing current limitations and future opportunities.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Alberto Tozzi

In order to successfully control and eliminate vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, an appropriate vaccine coverage has to be achieved and maintained. This task requires a high level of effort as it may be compromised by a number of barriers. Public health agencies have issued specific recommendations to address these barriers and therefore improve immunization programs. In the present review, we characterize issues and challenges of immunization programs for which digital tools are a potential solution. In particular, we explore previously published research on the use of digital tools in the following vaccine-related areas: immunization registries, dose tracking, and decision support systems; vaccine-preventable diseases surveillance; surveillance of adverse events following immunizations; vaccine confidence monitoring; and delivery of information on vaccines to the public. Subsequently, we analyze the limits of the use of digital tools in such contexts and envision future possibilities and challenges.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →