StayCurrentMD · Outcomes of Sutureless versus Sutured Closure for Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Article1 min read·Published Dec 2025

Outcomes of Sutureless versus Sutured Closure for Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Dec 2025 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This meta-analysis compares sutureless versus traditional sutured repair techniques for gastroschisis, a congenital abdominal wall defect. The review synthesizes evidence on safety and clinical outcomes to guide surgical decision-making in neonatal patients requiring gastroschisis closure.

  • Sutureless closure offers a minimally invasive alternative to traditional sutured repair for gastroschisis management.
  • Uncertainty remains regarding the comparative safety profile of sutureless versus sutured gastroschisis closure techniques.
  • Systematic review synthesizes evidence comparing clinical outcomes between sutureless and sutured closure methods.
  • Meta-analysis provides quantitative assessment of treatment efficacy for both gastroschisis closure approaches.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Sutureless closure is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional sutured repair for gastroschisis, yet, uncertainty persists regarding its safety and outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare treatment outcomes of sutured and sutureless gastroschisis closure.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →