StayCurrentMD · Outcomes after open thoracotomy repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula: A 10-year Middle Eastern multicenter retrospective cohort
Article1 min read·Published Dec 2025

Outcomes after open thoracotomy repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula: A 10-year Middle Eastern multicenter retrospective cohort

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Dec 2025 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This 10-year multicenter retrospective cohort examines outcomes following open thoracotomy repair of esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula in Middle Eastern healthcare settings. The study quantifies mortality rates, complication profiles, feeding outcomes, and hospital length of stay to identify care gaps and inform quality improvement initiatives in resource-constrained environments.

  • Middle Eastern EA repair outcomes show wide variation, highlighting need for standardized protocols in resource-constrained settings
  • Open thoracotomy remains standard approach; study quantifies mortality, complications, and feeding outcomes over 10-year period
  • Hospital length of stay serves as key quality metric, with identifiable risk factors guiding targeted improvement efforts
  • Contemporary multicenter data fills critical gap in understanding EA repair outcomes outside high-resource Western centers
  • Characterizing care gaps enables evidence-based quality improvement initiatives tailored to regional resource constraints

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Global outcomes after esophageal atresia (EA) repair vary widely, yet contemporary data from resource-constrained Middle Eastern settings are scarce. Characterizing risks and care gaps can guide quality improvement. This retrospective study addresses this gap and quantifies mortality, complication severity, feeding status, and determinants of hospital length of stay (LOS) after open thoracotomy EA repair.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →